Anti Dumping Investigations By Peru Countries On Clothing And Accessories Products Up To 276 Tax Numbers In China

< p > > after more than 1 years of investigation and evidence collection, the Peru national competition and Intellectual Property Protection Bureau (INDECOPI) issued a "key fact report" (524 pages) on the anti dumping survey of "a" target= "_blank" href= "//www.sjfzxm.com/" > dress < /a > and accessories products, which was launched by Peru in June 2012, with up to 276 tax numbers. The main facts were as follows: < /p >

< p > China's < a target= "_blank" href= "//www.sjfzxm.com/" > textile < /a > chamber of Commerce put forward that Indecopi failed to give enough time to protect the right to sue during the suit. The secret side retorted that the agency had requested 7 days to 10 days in accordance with the law of secret law when the agency requested the Chinese to provide materials.

The secret side also agreed with China's request for an extension.

< /p >

< p > on the issue of Indecopi forcing the domestic producers to provide information by administrative penalties, the secret side retorts that according to the 807th law of the secret, whether the unit required to provide information is involved in the case, in order to ensure that the secret investigation agency fulfil its investigative case's authority, it has the right to impose sanctions on the units that hide, destroy or change the investigation information.

If the unit provides false information, fails to fulfill the information requirements, or prevents the investigation agency from exercising its functions and powers, it will also be punished.

< /p >

< p > on the time limit for investigation, the Chinese government has protested that the product analysis and investigation period was more than 5 months apart from the start of the anti-dumping investigation, which did not meet the requirements of the two deadline mentioned by WTO.

For this reason, the secret side retorted that, in view of the data collection and other administrative affairs still need a certain amount of time before the start of the case, and in accordance with the WTO case recognition in other cases, Indecopi thought the interval of the 6 months was normal.

< /p >

< p > on the definition of the product under investigation, Indecopi said that the standards defined are mainly classified according to the functions of clothing and accessories and customs tax numbers.

Therefore, in view of the fact that the Chinese clothing and accessories products have the same depth of composition, the same textile methods, the same function and the same customs tariff number, they are regarded as similar products.

< /p >

< p > to determine the normal value, Indecopi said, in view of the fact that the Chinese textile industry has a specific market situation in the registration report (such as the Chinese government's subsidy and preferential policies for the textile industry), according to the relevant anti-dumping regulations of WTO and GATT, the normal value of the case can be determined by exporting to third countries or rebuilding the price.

Taking into account the fact that the clothing products exported by the 10 Chinese enterprises involved in the survey are different, the method of determining the normal value of the third country price in the early stage of the registration is considered unreasonable.

Therefore, the final method is price reconstruction.

< /p >

< p > on the dumping margin, Indecopi identified 10 different dumping margins for each of the Chinese export enterprises surveyed by product category, but the report also believed that each enterprise had some categories of products without dumping.

For Chinese companies without complaint, Indecopi separately determined the dumping margin of 12.6% to 334.8% except for other categories of suits.

< /p >

< p > on the domestic industry damage of secret industry, Indecopi analyzed the cash flow, investment, employment, worker's wages, production capacity, and secret product sales market from the secret clothing industry in China (domestic or overseas), and analyzed the damage of China's export secret clothing products to the domestic industry.

< /p >

< p > take the overcoat products as an example. During the period from 2009 to 2011, the products imported from China by secret from China accounted for 94.4% (average) of the imports of the same kind of products.

China's overcoat products occupy 88.5% to 88.9% of China's market share, and China is the biggest provider of secret products.

The average price of Chinese coats is much lower than that of other secret export countries, such as Vietnam, and is also lower than that of other similar products in China.

Although the domestic output of the secretaries increased by 15% during the period, domestic sales increased by 25%, but the market share of secret products accounted for 6.7% from 5%.

The contribution rate of Chinese products to the growth of China's domestic market is as high as 89.6%, and Chinese products occupy most of the market in China.

Secret domestic product inventories increased by 20% during the above period, as domestic output rose but sales fell.

Wages, the secret production of the product industry workers wages increased by 5%, productivity increased by 0.5%.

Profit margins declined from 11.1% to 7.8%.

< /p >